Introduction
The Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan has once again become a flashpoint in global geopolitics. In a sharp warning posted on Truth Social, US President Donald Trump threatened that “something bad will happen” if Afghanistan does not return control of Bagram to the United States.
This is the second time within a week Trump has raised the issue, having first mentioned it during a joint press conference in London with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The remarks underscore Trump’s determination to reassert America’s military presence in the region, even four years after the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan in 2021.
The demand has been firmly rejected by the Taliban, who have ruled Afghanistan since the US-backed government collapsed in August 2021. The dispute over Bagram has reignited questions about America’s legacy in Afghanistan, the costs of war, and the future of US–Taliban relations.
Trump’s Threat
In his post, Trump declared:
“If Afghanistan does not return Bagram Air Base to the United States, the ones who built it, then something very bad will happen.”
He hinted that his administration could explore a “deal with the Taliban” to regain access, though it remains unclear how such a deal could be structured.
During the London press conference earlier in the week, Trump called the effort to reclaim Bagram “urgent breaking news,” signaling that his administration views the issue as a top security concern.
Taliban Response
The Taliban government quickly dismissed Trump’s demands. A senior Afghan foreign ministry official posted on X (formerly Twitter) that cooperation between Afghanistan and the United States would only occur without any foreign military presence inside the country.
The Taliban remain determined to preserve their sovereignty and independence, seeing any return of US forces as a betrayal of their decades-long struggle to remove Western troops from Afghan soil.
Historical Context of Bagram
Bagram is not just an air base; it is a symbol of Afghanistan’s modern history of conflict:
-
Soviet Era: Originally built during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (1979–1989).
-
US Occupation: After the September 11, 2001 attacks, the US transformed Bagram into its largest military hub in Afghanistan, housing thousands of troops.
-
Facilities: The base once contained American fast-food outlets like Burger King and Pizza Hut, shopping stores, a massive prison facility, and command centers.
-
Symbol of Power: For nearly two decades, Bagram represented America’s military dominance in Afghanistan.
-
Withdrawal (2021): When US forces left, they destroyed around 16,000 pieces of military equipment and handed control to Afghan forces, only for the Taliban to seize it shortly afterward.
The Cost of War
The US investment in Afghanistan was staggering:
-
$143.27 billion spent on reconstruction projects since 2002.
-
Of that, $88.32 billion went to Afghan security and defense forces.
-
Nearly $36 billion was spent on governance and development programs.
-
Billions more went into counter-narcotics operations and humanitarian aid.
Despite these vast sums, Afghanistan remains one of the poorest countries in the world, and the Taliban’s return to power has left many questioning whether the investment was wasted.
Why Bagram Matters
Bagram holds strategic and symbolic importance for multiple reasons:
-
Geopolitical Location: Its proximity to Iran, China, and Central Asia makes it a highly valuable military hub.
-
Counterterrorism: The US argues that control of Bagram is vital for monitoring extremist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS-K.
-
Prestige and Symbolism: For America, regaining Bagram would represent a reversal of the humiliation of 2021, when US forces left in disarray. For the Taliban, keeping Bagram symbolizes their victory over the world’s most powerful military.
Global Reactions
Trump’s comments have sparked debate both at home and abroad:
-
Supporters in the US argue that retaking Bagram is essential for protecting American interests in South Asia and preventing future terror attacks.
-
Critics warn that any attempt to forcefully regain the base could reignite war in Afghanistan, costing more lives and billions of dollars.
-
Taliban’s Allies (including some regional powers) view Trump’s comments as provocative, potentially destabilizing an already fragile region.
Analysis: What’s Next?
Trump’s remarks raise more questions than answers:
-
Is a military return feasible? A US re-entry into Afghanistan seems highly unlikely without sparking renewed conflict.
-
Could there be a deal? The Taliban might consider limited cooperation if it benefits them financially or politically, but they are unlikely to surrender full control.
-
Impact on US Image: Pushing for Bagram underscores Trump’s desire to project strength, but it could also remind Americans of the “forever war” they overwhelmingly wanted to end.
Conclusion
The battle over Bagram Air Base is not just about one facility; it is about history, pride, and global power politics. For Trump, regaining Bagram would symbolize America’s return to strength and dominance. For the Taliban, keeping it represents the culmination of decades of struggle.
What happens next could determine whether Afghanistan remains relatively stable under Taliban rule or whether it once again becomes a battleground in America’s endless search for security.
For now, one thing is clear: Bagram remains a ghost of America’s longest war, and a reminder that its legacy is far from over.
Comments
Post a Comment